top of page

FerrumFortis

Stainless Steel Solicitude: Belgian Beneficiaries Bypass Barriers

Thursday, June 5, 2025

Synopsis: The U.S. Department of Commerce preliminarily finds that Aperam Stainless Belgium NV did not sell stainless steel plate in coils at less than normal value during 2023-2024, resulting in a 0.00% dumping margin, while rescinding reviews for four other Belgian companies due to no reviewable entries.

Commerce Cognoscenti Conclude Conspicuous Corporate Clearance

The U.S. Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration has reached a preliminary determination that Aperam Stainless Belgium NV conducted its stainless steel plate in coils exports to the United States in accordance with fair trade practices during the review period spanning May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. This significant finding, announced on June 4, 2025, represents a comprehensive assessment of ASB's pricing methodology & market behavior, demonstrating compliance including established international trade regulations. The preliminary results indicate a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00%, effectively clearing the Belgian manufacturer of allegations that it sold products below normal value in the American market. Samuel Brummitt from the AD/CVD Operations Office III served as the primary contact for this extensive administrative review process.

 

Antediluvian Administrative Architecture Anchors Assessment Apparatus

The current administrative review stems from an antidumping duty order originally established on May 21, 1999, creating a regulatory framework that has governed Belgian stainless steel plate in coils imports for over two decades. This foundational order reflects the Commerce Department's commitment to protecting American steel manufacturers from unfair foreign competition practices that could undermine domestic industry viability. The longevity of this regulatory mechanism demonstrates the persistent nature of international trade oversight & the necessity for periodic reassessment of market conditions. The 1999 order established the legal foundation for ongoing monitoring of Belgian stainless steel exports, ensuring continued compliance including fair trade principles across multiple review cycles.

 

Methodical Machinery Manifests Meticulous Market Monitoring

The Commerce Department initiated this administrative review on July 5, 2024, following timely requests for assessment & in accordance including section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, covering five exporters & producers initially subject to investigation. The review process employed sophisticated analytical methodologies, calculating constructed export prices according to section 772 of the Act while determining normal values under section 773 provisions. Multiple deadline extensions occurred throughout the process, including a seven-day toll in July 2024 & an additional 90-day extension in December 2024, reflecting the complexity & thoroughness required for accurate trade determination. The extended timeline ultimately pushed preliminary results to June 6, 2025, ensuring comprehensive analysis of all relevant market data & pricing information.

 

Rescission Rationale Reflects Rigorous Regulatory Requirements

Commerce rescinded the administrative review for four Belgian companies, ArcelorMittal Genk, Fenixs Steel NV, Helaxa BVBA, & Industeel Belgium, after determining these entities had no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the specified review period. This rescission decision aligns including established Commerce Department practice under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), which requires the presence of suspended entries for liquidation assessment purposes. The absence of reviewable entries for these companies meant no basis existed for calculating assessment rates or conducting meaningful trade practice evaluation. On August 8, 2024, Commerce notified interested parties of its intent to rescind reviews for these four companies & received no objections, confirming the appropriateness of this administrative decision.

 

Sophisticated Scrutiny Systems Safeguard Systematic Standards

The methodology employed in this review encompassed comprehensive analysis of pricing structures, market conditions, & competitive dynamics affecting Belgian stainless steel exports to American markets. Commerce Department investigators utilized advanced analytical frameworks to calculate constructed export prices & normal values, ensuring accurate representation of market realities & fair comparison standards. The assessment process involved detailed examination of production costs, administrative expenses, selling costs, & profit margins to establish appropriate benchmarks for dumping determination. This rigorous analytical approach guarantees that preliminary findings reflect genuine market conditions rather than superficial price comparisons that might misrepresent actual trade practices.

 

Preliminary Pronouncements Portend Potential Policy Perpetuation

The 0.00% dumping margin determination for Aperam Stainless Belgium NV suggests that the company's current pricing practices align including fair trade principles & do not constitute unfair competition against American steel manufacturers. This preliminary finding indicates that ASB's export pricing methodology reflects legitimate market forces rather than artificially subsidized or below-cost selling strategies. The determination potentially influences future trade relationships between Belgian steel producers & American importers, providing greater certainty for business planning & investment decisions. However, stakeholders must recognize that these represent preliminary findings subject to potential modification through final determination processes & interested party comments.

 

Procedural Protocols Promote Persistent Protective Provisions

The administrative review process demonstrates the Commerce Department's commitment to maintaining vigilant oversight of international trade practices while ensuring fair treatment for foreign manufacturers operating in compliance including established regulations. The extensive timeline & multiple deadline extensions reflect the thoroughness required for accurate trade determination, balancing the need for comprehensive analysis including efficient administrative processing. Interested parties retain opportunities to provide additional information & comments that could influence final determinations, ensuring transparent & participatory decision-making processes. The review mechanism provides essential protection for American industry while maintaining open markets for fairly-traded foreign products.

 

Documentation Dissemination Demonstrates Democratic Deliberation

Commerce Department officials have made preliminary decision memoranda & supporting documentation available through the Antidumping & Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System, ensuring public access to relevant information & analysis. This transparency initiative enables interested parties, industry stakeholders, & legal representatives to review methodologies & findings that support preliminary determinations. The public availability of decision documents reflects democratic principles of government accountability & provides opportunities for informed participation in trade policy development. Complete documentation access through https://access.trade.gov facilitates comprehensive understanding of administrative decisions & supports evidence-based policy evaluation by stakeholders across the steel industry supply chain.

 

Key Takeaways:

• U.S. Commerce Department preliminarily determines Aperam Stainless Belgium NV achieved 0.00% dumping margin for stainless steel plate in coils during May 2023-April 2024 review period, indicating fair trade practices

• Administrative review rescinded for four Belgian companies (ArcelorMittal Genk, Fenixs Steel NV, Helaxa BVBA, & Industeel Belgium) due to absence of reviewable entries during the assessment period

• Review process originated from 1999 antidumping order & employed comprehensive methodology calculating constructed export prices & normal values under sections 772 & 773 of the Tariff Act

bottom of page