top of page

VirFerrOx

European Steel Sector's Green Ambitions Wither Amid Market Adversity

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Synopsis: The European steel industry's decarbonization efforts are faltering as manufacturers face a triple threat of rising production costs, surging low-cost imports from Asia, and weakening domestic demand, with major players like ArcelorMittal and thyssenkrupp postponing critical green investments despite maintaining premium pricing for environmentally friendly products.

#Market Fundamentals Deteriorate as Imports Surge

The European steel sector continues to grapple with challenging market conditions that threaten both its economic viability and environmental ambitions. While crude steel output across Europe showed a modest recovery to 129.5 million metric tons in 2024, up from 126.3 million metric tons in 2023, production remains significantly below pre-pandemic levels of 159.4 million metric tons recorded in 2019. This production shortfall coincides with a troubling consumption trend, as apparent steel consumption in the EU declined by 2.3% to 127 million metric tons in 2024, down from 130 million metric tons the previous year. Even more concerning, real steel consumption experienced a steeper 3.8% contraction, falling to approximately 132.7 million metric tons from around 138 million metric tons in 2023. Against this backdrop of weakening domestic demand, European producers face intensifying competition from imports, which grew by 6.4% to reach 26.36 million metric tons in 2024, compared to 24.78 million metric tons in 2023, according to European steel association Eurofer. This growing import penetration has exacerbated the challenges facing local manufacturers, with one German steel mill bluntly stating, "It's not [attractive] to produce steel in Europe anymore."

 

#Green Investment Plans Stall Amid Economic Uncertainty

The deteriorating market conditions have forced major European steelmakers to reconsider their decarbonization timelines and investment strategies. In autumn 2024, ArcelorMittal, Europe's largest steelmaker, announced it would postpone final decisions on several planned direct-reduced iron (DRI) modules across Europe, citing challenging market fundamentals. The company indicated it would only review its investment priorities in Europe following the implementation of the EU's Steel and Metals Action Plan, effectively tying its green commitments to regulatory support. Similarly, in March 2025, Germany's largest steelmaker thyssenkrupp put a hydrogen tender for its green steel plant on hold due to elevated prices, though it maintained its commitment to the Duisburg site's green transformation in principle. These delays reflect the industry's growing reluctance to commit substantial capital to decarbonization projects without clearer economic incentives or regulatory certainty. As one European mill source told Fastmarkets, "investing billions of euros in decarbonization was becoming unmanageable" under current market conditions, highlighting the tension between environmental ambitions and financial realities.

 

#Return on Investment Challenges Hamper Green Transition

The economic viability of green steel investments has emerged as a critical obstacle to the industry's decarbonization efforts. European producers have invested significantly in developing lower-carbon production methods, obtaining environmental certifications, and creating Environmental Product Declarations, but many struggle to recoup these costs through price premiums. "Every project needs return on investments. We put money into green energy, certifications, EPDs, etc. And we struggle to charge premiums for decarbonized steel because buyers are not willing to pay a single euro more in such market," a long steel producer explained to Fastmarkets. This reluctance among customers to pay higher prices for green steel creates a fundamental economic barrier to further investment in decarbonization technologies. Without sufficient price premiums to offset the higher production costs associated with lower-carbon steelmaking, manufacturers face diminishing financial incentives to pursue ambitious environmental targets. The situation creates a challenging paradox: while European policymakers push for industrial decarbonization, market conditions increasingly discourage the very investments needed to achieve these goals.

 

#Public Procurement Policies Fail to Drive Green Steel Demand

Industry sources identify the absence of robust public procurement policies for green steel as a significant factor limiting market development. The lack of government-led projects that specifically require lower-carbon steel has restricted demand growth for these premium products. "If authorities do not push for green steel use through public procurement, [green steel] will remain a niche market," noted one mill source, highlighting the crucial role that public sector demand could play in driving the transition. A distributor similarly emphasized that "the distribution of green steel will be working... if we make green steel, put a label on it and make it part of public procurement." Without such policy support, manufacturers struggle to find sufficient customers willing to absorb the higher costs associated with greener production methods. This situation points to a potential disconnect between Europe's ambitious climate targets and the practical implementation of supporting policies to create market demand for lower-carbon materials. The absence of coordinated procurement requirements across European countries has left the green steel market fragmented and underdeveloped, despite significant investments in production capacity.

 

#Nordic Countries Lead Green Steel Adoption

Despite the generally challenging market conditions, European mills report that Nordic countries have emerged as the primary destination for their green steel products. "Buyers [of green steel] in Norway, Denmark and Sweden are more motivated to buy green steel. They know they can pass the costs [of green steel] down to the end user, because there are many public projects requiring green steel procurement," explained a buyer source. This regional variation in demand highlights the importance of supportive policy frameworks and cultural factors in driving market adoption of lower-carbon products. The Nordic region's stronger environmental policies, including green procurement requirements for public projects, have created more favorable conditions for green steel adoption compared to other European markets. This geographic concentration of demand presents both opportunities and challenges for European producers, who may need to focus their marketing efforts on regions with more developed green markets while continuing to advocate for similar policies across the broader European market. The success of green steel in Nordic countries provides a potential model for how targeted policies can effectively stimulate demand for lower-carbon materials.

 

#Premium Pricing Persists Despite Market Challenges

Despite difficulties in finding willing buyers, European producers continue to maintain substantial price premiums for their green steel offerings. Fastmarkets' weekly assessment of the green steel, domestic, flat-rolled, differential to HRC index for Northern Europe stood at €150-200 per metric ton on May 8, unchanged from the previous week. For long products, the green steel differential to steel reinforcing bar (rebar) for Northern Europe was assessed at €20-40 per metric ton, widening upward from €20-30 per metric ton a week earlier. These premiums reflect the significantly higher production costs associated with lower-carbon steelmaking methods, including the use of green hydrogen, renewable electricity, and more advanced production technologies. However, the persistence of these premiums in a challenging market environment raises questions about the long-term viability of current pricing strategies. If manufacturers cannot find sufficient customers willing to pay these higher prices, they may eventually face pressure to reduce premiums or absorb the additional costs internally, further complicating the economic case for decarbonization investments.

 

#Energy Costs Remain Central to Decarbonization Equation

The high cost of energy in Europe continues to pose a fundamental challenge to the steel industry's decarbonization efforts. "The effect of energy prices and also the cost of steel within the green transformation is one of the key issues," noted a distributor source, highlighting how energy costs directly impact the economic viability of lower-carbon production methods. Many green steelmaking technologies, particularly those utilizing hydrogen or electric arc furnaces powered by renewable electricity, are significantly more energy-intensive than traditional blast furnace routes. As a result, European producers face a double disadvantage: not only are their energy costs generally higher than global competitors, but their transition to greener production methods often requires even greater energy consumption. This creates a challenging economic equation that threatens to undermine the industry's decarbonization ambitions. Without more competitive energy prices or substantial policy support to offset these higher costs, European manufacturers may struggle to justify the investments needed to reduce their carbon footprint while remaining internationally competitive.

 

#Industry Awaits Coordinated Policy Response

As market conditions continue to challenge the European steel industry, manufacturers are increasingly looking to policymakers for a coordinated response that addresses both competitive pressures and decarbonization objectives. ArcelorMittal's decision to link its investment plans to the implementation of the EU's Steel and Metals Action Plan reflects this growing dependence on regulatory support. The industry faces a complex set of interrelated challenges that individual companies cannot address alone: import competition, high energy costs, weak domestic demand, and insufficient price premiums for green products. Addressing these issues effectively will likely require a comprehensive policy approach that combines trade measures to ensure fair competition, energy policies to reduce costs, procurement requirements to stimulate demand for green steel, and potentially direct financial support for decarbonization investments. Without such coordinated action, Europe risks losing not only its steel manufacturing capacity but also its leadership position in industrial decarbonization. The coming months will be critical in determining whether European policymakers can develop and implement the support mechanisms needed to preserve the industry's economic viability while advancing its environmental transformation.

 

#Key Takeaways:

• European steel production recovered slightly to 129.5 million metric tons in 2024 but remains well below pre-pandemic levels, while real steel consumption contracted by 3.8% to 132.7 million metric tons amid a 6.4% surge in imports to 26.36 million metric tons

• Major steelmakers including ArcelorMittal and thyssenkrupp have postponed critical decarbonization investments due to challenging market conditions, despite maintaining price premiums of €150-200 per metric ton for green flat steel products

• Nordic countries have emerged as the primary market for European green steel due to supportive public procurement policies, while producers struggle to find customers willing to pay green premiums in other regions, highlighting the need for broader policy support to stimulate demand

bottom of page